Barelli Says Coaches To Join Athletes At Top Table & Earn $ Prizes If He Wins FINA Fight

Paolo Barelli - by Giorgio Scala/Deepbluemedia

Paolo Barelli, the Italian standing for the presidency of FINA in a July 22 vote in Budapest, will add two athletes and a coach to the ruling Bureau of the international federation within 30 days of the vote if he emerges the winner.

Further, he will increase prize money at World Championships and include provision in financial rewards for the coaches of athletes who muscle in on the medals.

In his second Newsletter outlining the measures he would take if elected president of FINA over the incumbent Julio Maglione, the 81-year-old Uruguayan, Barelli also makes a pledge to coaches that they will be a part of the Panel of Experts he intends to appoint to look into matters that will shape the future of aquatic sports.

As athletes and coaches working with the Professional Swimmer’s Association continue to work on shaping their own future, with or without FINA if the international federation does not change its ways, Barelli concludes:

“Dear Athletes, dear Coaches, I want to see a new FINA which we will continue to build together and which will grow and develop into a better and stronger World of Aquatics.”

Barelli’s open letter in full:

The FINA stage is set for change or death on the vine – by Patrick B. Kraemer

My Manifesto published on 27 June in support of my candidature to the FINA Presidency stated: ‘We must recognise that, were it not for the top Athletes, the outstanding success achieved would not have been possible. Success is accomplished by attracting viewers to the media and through spectators at FINA events being assured of watching great Athletes giving great performances’.

In my Newsletter No 1 I mentioned that “to further promote and guarantee the level aquatic disciplines have reached, we must continue to reinforce the necessary support to the Federations, the athletes and the coaches”, which are the three key pillars of our aquatic disciplines.

In my opinion, it is now time to speed up the modernisation process within the ambit of our aquatic disciplines. This must also provide for further and deeper responsible inclusion of two categories which represent the success achieved by our sports: the Athletes and the Coaches.

I participated at two Olympic Games and I was a medalist at the World Championships. I therefore value very strongly the importance that both Athletes and Coaches have within our aquatic family.

I also feel that the Athletes and Coaches should take a more official role in order to positively contribute to the decision making process: this precious effort must certainly be recognised as “added value” and cannot therefore be side-lined when decisions need to be taken.

The very substantial financial support provided for within my Manifesto in favour of the Federations will certainly create the basis for a stronger and more solid collaboration with the Athletes and Coaches.

With these thoughts in mind I want to take appropriate decisions on matters related to them.

A. Athletes and Coaches on the FINA Bureau

In my programme, within thirty days of my election, I will introduce a rule which will cater for two athletes, one female and one male, together with one coach to sit on the FINA Bureau, and having full rights.

I am firmly convinced that the election of members representing thousands of athletes and coaches should be held following a clear electoral process based on maximum participation and within a set up based on democracy and transparency.

It is my intention to establish that the representatives of both Athletes and Coaches be elected as Bureau Members following similar electoral procedures adopted by the International Olympic Committee when appointing the Athletes’ Commission. The mandate should follow the quadrennial Olympic cycle as is the case for the other Bureau Members.

B. Prize Money allocation shall not be limited to Athletes but will include Coaches

My electoral Manifesto provides for a significant financial contribution by FINA towards the activities of National Federations for International Activities and Development programmes. In this respect I stated: ‘My vision is that FINA must give all the support possible to the Federations, including economic support, in order for them to contribute further to the growth of the aquatic disciplines worldwide’. 

I am ever more convinced that the financial support offered by FINA in the form of Prize Money for Athletes at the World Championships should not only be maintained but rather increased.

Moreover, I am of the opinion that the payment of Prize Money should also be extended to Coaches. The share of the Prize Money for the Coaches will be commensurate to that for the Athletes and would be payable following pre-established criteria.

This firm wish will ensure an increased Prize Money fund is established.

As already highlighted in my Manifesto I want to give Coaches the opportunity to be part of the Panel of Experts which I intend to appoint. This will be done in full cooperation with the FINA Bureau and the Technical Committee responsible for each discipline.

Finally, I feel that FINA must give an opportunity to all its protagonists to have their say and to give the strongest contribution possible in this regard.

Dear Athletes, dear Coaches, I want to see a new FINA which we will continue to build together and which will grow and develop into a better and stronger World of Aquatics.

  • Paolo Barelli
    President
    Ligue Européenne de Natation (LEN)
    Italian Swimming Federation (FIN)
    Candidate for the FINA Presidency

Paolo Barelli, the Italian standing for the presidency of FINA in a July 22 vote in Budapest, will add two athletes and a coach to the ruling Bureau of the international federation within 30 days of the vote if he emerges the winner. Further, he will increase prize money at World Championships and include provision in financial rewards for the coaches of athletes who muscle in on the medals. In his second Newsletter outlining the measures he would take if elected president of FINA over the incumbent Julio Maglione, the 81-year-old Uruguayan, Barelli also makes a pledge to coaches that they will be a part of the Panel of Experts he intends to appoint to look into matters that will shape the future of aquatic sports.

Comments

commonwombat

What IS Dunn’s precise position on the FINA Bureau ? Is he AUS/Oceania’s representative OR is his role solely that of Chairman of the Athlete’s Committee as there IS a very significant point of difference.

“The Bureau consists of the President, the Honorary Secretary, the Honorary Treasurer, five Vice Presidents one from each of the five Continents (one of whom is the First Vice President), and 15 additional members. The Honorary Life President, the Immediate Past President, the Immediate Past First Vice President, the Immediate Past Honorary Secretary, and the Immediate Past Honorary Treasurer are also members of the Bureau with voice, but without vote. The Chairman of the Athletes Committee is a member of the FINA Bureau without vote.”

If he is one of those 23 voting members then certainly he SHOULD be open to question as to what he may have done/not done. I WOULD be curious to know what directions he may have from Swimming AUS and how that may’ve impacted his actions but by and large, if it IS the case that he has voting powers then subject him to due scrutiny …. and criticism if it so plays out.

If it is the case that his position is that of a non-voting member then essentially whatever he says/does/tables at any such sessions holds only as much weight as what the voting members may deign to extend towards him. In short, the position is realistically political “window dressing”.

Perhaps he could/should have resigned in high dudgeon raining scorn and fury on all concerned at such treatment …. but to what effect ? Would it have changed anything … would it have raised any real ripples in the wider swimming or sporting world ? Did Jacco Verhaeren’s resignation from the FINA’s Coaching Adivisory body have any material impacts ? Again, what were/are Dunn’s “riding instructions” from Swimming Australia (his home federation) ?

longstroke

I might be cynical but it appears to me that Matt Dunn was selected because he is the compliant type.

I haven’t studied the structure carefully but from what I can see the make-up of the FINA Bureau looks more like something you would expect to see in a private club rather than in a best-practice global body.

I can’t recall which study it was that found that once the number of representatives on a committee exceeds 8 or 9 the effectiveness of the committee starts to diminish accordingly. A common sense approach would be to cull the number who sit at the top table but make sure they are smart, competent, ethical and truly representative of the people they are meant to be serving.

Craig Lord

He is the athletes’ rep/chairman of that commission… a political apptmnt that is ineffective in terms of actually representing the concerns of athletes… his presence pays lip service to the role that ought to be real and effective, as far as I can see. He ought to be having nothing to do with organising lists of flower presenters etc… that’s the equivalent of the tea boy of old. Stop it! CW, the logic of ‘what would it achieve’ does not work for me… in extremis, it is the same as ‘only following orders – not my fault’… if you’re part of the machine and do nothing about it when you absolutely can do something about it, then you are part of the problem not the solution.

Craig Lord

Spot on longstroke – and they need to be from a broad church of relevant expertise (inc, business skills that transcend swimming but could help the sport make the next step)

Leave a comment

Post a comment with your SwimVortex Account. Don't have a SwimVortex Account, Sign Up?

(*) Fields are required!
×